Griffith, A (2011) Delivering best value in the small works portfolio of public sector organizations when using preferred contractors. Construction Management and Economics, 29(9), pp. 891-900. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
The use of preferred contractors through a partnering arrangement is a prominent method of relationshipbased procurement. The approach is frequently applied to managing the small works portfolio of public authorities. While the apparent benefits to client organizations of employing preferred contractors are widely known, questions surrounding the timeliness, duration, risk, disruption, quality and cost of works in the public sector are often rightly asked. The process and practices involved in small works procurement and management are crucial to the successful management of a public authority's portfolio and they are examined in this research with the support of three case studies. The findings highlight that: the characteristics of small works, which are of fundamental influence on their effective undertaking, are often misunderstood; the criteria describing successful small works are not well recognized; small works are sometimes inappropriately planned and undertaken inefficiently; and the worksite environment and local inhabitants are largely ignored when works are carried out. To improve the procurement and management of individual small works and the wider small works portfolio there must be better oversight practices during procurement and throughout works administration by public authorities and their contracted partners coupled with more effective management and onsite supervision by contractors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client; partnering; procurement; small works; strategic management |
| Index terms: | public sector, onsite, partnering, case study, duration, supervision, best value, client organization, public sector organization, public authority, strategic management |
| Subjects: | management, administrative law, partnership management, project controls, building construction, control systems, data collection methods, client relations, bidding |
| Topics: | Procurement, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Time Control, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here