Factors influencing the risk of falls in the construction industry: A review of the evidence

Hu, K; Rahmandad, H; Smith-Jackson, T and Winchester, W (2011) Factors influencing the risk of falls in the construction industry: A review of the evidence. Construction Management and Economics, 29(4), pp. 397-416. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Falls are a significant public health risk and a leading cause of non-fatal and fatal injuries among construction workers worldwide. A more comprehensive understanding of casual factors leading to fall incidents is essential to prevent falls in the construction industry. However, an extensive overview of causal factors is missing from the literature. In this paper, 536 articles on factors contributing to the risk of falls were retrieved. One hundred and twenty-one (121) studies met the criteria for relevance and quality to be coded, and were synthesized to provide an overview. In lieu of the homogeneity needed across studies to conduct a structured meta-analysis, a literature synthesis method based on macro-variables was advanced. This method provides a flexible approach to aggregating previous findings and assessing agreement across those studies. Factors commonly associated with falls included working surfaces and platforms, workers' safety behaviours and attitudes, and construction structure and facilities. Significant differences across qualitative and quantitative studies were found in terms of focus, and areas with limited agreement in previous research were identified. The findings contribute to research on the causes of falls in construction, developing engineering controls, informing policy and intervention design to reduce the risk of falls, and improving research synthesis methods.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accident causes; causal map; literature synthesis methods; safety
Index terms: construction worker, construction industry, safety behaviour, falls, public health, platform, evidence, injury, meta-analysis
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, health conditions and diseases, research evaluation and metrics, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, industry analysis, health risk and incident analysis, digital design
Topics: Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here