Jarkas, A M and Horner, R M W (2011) Revisiting the applicability of learning curve theory to formwork labour productivity. Construction Management and Economics, 29(5), pp. 483-493. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
The learning phenomenon has proved applicable in various industries, especially those associated with mass productions, such as aircraft and automobile assembly. The learning process in labour-intensive industries is assumed to be more significant in the sense that automated work is constrained by the fact that machines cannot benefit from previous experience and therefore would not 'learn' to run any faster or increase the rate of production. Several previous investigations into the applicability of learning curve theory to the construction industry proved the importance of this concept to labour productivity. Nevertheless, a thorough examination of the literature revealed a dearth of research into the effect of learning on the formwork operation of building floors. Consequently, the objective of this research is to explore the influence of recurring building floor configurations on formwork labour productivity. To achieve this objective, formwork labour inputs from 45 multi-storey in situ reinforced concrete building frames were collected and analysed using the straight-line learning curve model. The cumulative average input for each cycle, i.e. floor, and its associated cycle number were modelled using the least squares method. According to the learning curve theory, we expect the labour inputs to decrease by a certain percentage, as the cycle number increases. Based on the results obtained, there is very little evidence for that.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | formwork; labour inputs; labour productivity; learning curve theory; learning phenomenon |
| Index terms: | configuration, reinforced concrete, evidence, building floor, labour productivity, investigation, in-situ, construction industry, formwork |
| Subjects: | building construction, industry analysis, systems engineering, management, architectural elements, building materials, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here