Drug testing practices in the US construction industry in 2008

Olbina, S; Hinze, J and Arduengo, C (2011) Drug testing practices in the US construction industry in 2008. Construction Management and Economics, 29(10), pp. 1043-1057. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Drug testing is an effective way to improve jobsite safety, productivity and profits. Since drug use impairs the abilities of construction workers, many construction companies have implemented drug testing policies. The research aim was to identify the current drug testing practices of construction contractors. The research objectives were to determine: (1) the extent of the implementation of drug testing; (2) testing practices being used; (3) testing methods being used; (4) the most frequently drugs used; and (5) the use and prevalence of adulterants to cheat on drug tests. In 2008 the data were collected through surveys sent to US construction firms that were randomly selected from the Blue Book of Building and Construction. The results show that drug use continues to be a concern although the extent of drug use has declined in recent years. Most of the firms conduct both pre-employment drug screening and random drug testing. Marijuana and cocaine are the primary drugs used. Urine analysis continues to be the most common drug test used, while other testing methods are being explored with some hesitance. Cheating on drug tests appears to be a major concern. The results show that there is a statistically significant relationship between drug usage and safety performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adulterants; construction safety; drug testing methods; drug testing programmes; workers' compensation
Index terms: profit, programme, construction firm, survey, construction company, construction safety, construction contractor, safety performance, cheating, employment, productivity, screening, construction worker, compensation, testing, construction industry, implementation
Subjects: economic analysis, professional practice, contractual arrangements, behavioural issues, organization, data collection methods, dispute resolution, practitioner, project controls, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, industry analysis, management
Topics: Legal Issues, Human Resources, Ethics, Time Control, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here