How procurement options influence risk management in construction projects

Osipova, E and Eriksson, P E (2011) How procurement options influence risk management in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), pp. 1149-1158. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Before proceeding with a project, a client has to choose an appropriate procurement option that facilitates an effective project organization in general and a thorough risk management process in particular. By identifying three procurement variables that have a major influence on risk management: project delivery method, form of payment, and use of collaboration or partnering arrangements, the effect of each variable is studied. An exploratory study and a series of interviews with clients, contractors and consultants involved in 11 Swedish construction projects, were performed in order to examine how risk management was carried out in each project. Irrespective of the procurement option, many projects suffered from variations in cost affecting one or more actors. Risk management was not carried out systematically throughout project phases. However, in the projects with early involvement of the actors, their participation throughout the project, and opportunities for open dialogue and collaboration, a more thorough risk management process was found. While project delivery methods define formal risk allocation, the use of incentives and collaboration or partnering arrangements help to establish a collaborative approach to risk management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contract conditions; partnering; payment; procurement; risk management
Index terms: risk allocation, risk management, option, project delivery, partnering, contract condition, variation, collaboration, construction project, interview, project organization, exploratory study
Subjects: data collection methods, risk assessment, project delivery, research methods, management, contract structure, financial risk, production management, organizational theory, contractual condition, decision analysis, partnership management
Topics: Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here