Tsolas, I E (2011) Modelling profitability and effectiveness of Greek-listed construction firms: An integrated DEA and ratio analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 29(8), pp. 795-807. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Existing research on construction performance measurement is dominated by project level studies, and the firm stakeholders require the development of models that compare performance in terms of efficiency. A new framework that integrates data envelopment analysis (DEA) and ratio analysis using a two-step approach is described to evaluate performance in terms of profitability and effectiveness of a sample of construction firms listed on the Athens Exchange. In the first step, profitability and effectiveness are assessed by employing DEA and by using the profit margin (i.e. income-to-sales ratio), respectively. In the second step, a Tobit and an ordinary least squares model are used in order to identify the drivers of profitability efficiency and effectiveness, respectively. Results do point out positive links between profitability efficiency and effectiveness. Profitability inefficiency can be explained by the size and expenses-to-total revenue ratio, whereas effectiveness can be explained only by the latter explanatory variable. The research framework may benefit not only Greek construction firms, but also firms in other countries to quantify their performance and improve their competitive advantages.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction firms; data envelopment analysis; effectiveness; Greece; profitability efficiency |
| Index terms: | revenue, construction firm, profit, Greece, data envelopment analysis, modelling, income, profitability, effectiveness, ratio analysis, construction performance, efficiency, competitive advantage |
| Subjects: | market analysis, Geography, performance management, performance assessment, data analysis and analytics, analytical methods, economic analysis, organization |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Quality Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here