Undeclared work in the European construction industry: Evidence from a 2007 Eurobarometer survey

Williams, C C; Nadin, S J and Windebank, J (2011) Undeclared work in the European construction industry: Evidence from a 2007 Eurobarometer survey. Construction Management and Economics, 29(8), pp. 853-867. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

A widespread assumption has been that undeclared work is rife in the European construction industry. Despite this, there have been no European-wide surveys of the prevalence and character of undeclared work in this sector of the economy. To fill this gap, the findings are reported of a 2007 Eurobarometer survey on undeclared work involving 26 659 face-to-face interviews undertaken in 27 European Union member states. This reveals the widespread prevalence of undeclared work in the European construction industry along with its heterogeneous forms and uneven distribution both spatially and across different groups of the construction workforce. It then evaluates what needs to be done to tackle this problem. The argument is that doing nothing is seldom an option because this leaves intact the existing negative impacts of undeclared work on construction businesses, the construction workforce, customers and governments. Pursuing the eradication of such work is neither effective nor necessarily desirable since most governments wish to move such endeavour into the declared realm rather than simply eradicate it. In consequence, this paper advocates a policy approach of facilitating the formalization of declared work and then details a range of preventative, curative and commitment policy measures for achieving this in the European construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction sector; european union; informal employment; shadow economy; tax compliance
Index terms: European Union, employment, option, construction industry, policy measure, survey, commitment, face, compliance, interview, construction sector, evidence
Subjects: physical geography and landforms, management, health safety and environment, decision analysis, industry analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, policy studies, psychology
Topics: Organizational Design, Human Resources, Governance, Risk Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here