Elf, M; Svedbo Engström, M and Wijk, H (2012) An assessment of briefs used for designing healthcare environments: A survey in Sweden. Construction Management and Economics, 30(10), pp. 835-844. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
The brief is a central document in decision-making during the early stages of the planning and construction (briefing/programming) of healthcare environments. Thus, the demand on the content and quality of these documents is high. The content and quality of initial briefs developed in Sweden were assessed to obtain an up-to-date picture of current practices of writing project statements in the early stages of designing healthcare environments. A new instrument called the Content and Quality of Brief Instrument (CQB-I) was used to study 29 initial briefs. In many cases, the documentation in the briefs was incomplete and the information did not adequately address users' needs. In addition, the briefs often did not include any measurable outcomes or explicitly evidence-based information. These findings have implications for identifying areas for improvement in design teams' documentation practices. Assessment can have a real impact on the quality of briefs and can raise awareness of the need to improve the briefing process itself. This is one of the first studies to assess the content and quality of briefs and it provides a starting point for both practitioners and future researchers to explore the role of briefs in briefing process quality improvement.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessment; briefing; building design; healthcare; quality improvement |
| Index terms: | building design, quality improvement, Sweden, design team, documentation, survey, decision-making, evidence, programming, practitioner, documents, briefing |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, Geography, professional development, professional practice, project delivery, architectural design, programming, practitioner, scope management, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here