Greenwood, D and Gledson, B J (2012) The efficient scheduling of resources in engineering construction projects: Reflections on a case study from Iran. Construction Management and Economics, 30(8), pp. 687-695. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
A particular problem for productivity in engineering construction projects is poor front-end planning, in particular, the lack of attention to resource-loaded schedules. In such projects, resources are highly specific and constrained, resulting in conflicts that can compromise planned durations and add cost. There are many techniques available for mitigating these conflicts. These have been extensively reported and compared in the literature and some have been adopted into commercially available computerized scheduling packages that are used by most major contractors. Project managers normally have access only to the techniques offered by the software that their organizations happen to use. In the reported case, a heuristic algorithm developed by academics was implemented and tested against a well-known standard software scheduling tool on the construction of a combined-cycle power plant in Iran. When results were compared, the performance of the manually applied algorithm was found to be superior in its ability to provide acceptable time-cost trade-offs. The underlying argument is twofold. First, that deficiencies in planning (particularly the reconciliation of resource constraints with completion targets) are responsible for poor productivity in engineering construction projects. Second, as improved techniques for optimizing 'resource-loaded' schedules are continually being sought and devised, they should be made available to project managers; and the best way for this to happen is for them to be incorporated into commercially available project management software.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; heuristic algorithm; power plant construction; productivity; resource-loaded schedules |
| Index terms: | project manager, case study, heuristic, package, productivity, power plant, reflection, duration, time-cost trade-off, scheduling, power station construction, project management software, construction project, resource constraint |
| Subjects: | management, quantity surveying, civil engineering, production management, professional development, project controls, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, profession, risk assessment, digital technology, operations management, operations research, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here