Enablers supporting acceptance of earth-based material in UK urban housing sector

Zami, M S (2021) Enablers supporting acceptance of earth-based material in UK urban housing sector. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17(1-2), pp. 92-109. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Earth is not widely used in the UK and a vast majority of local construction professionals are unaware of the potential of contemporary earthen architecture and construction. A number of interrelated factors (inhibitors) render earth globally unpopular, and, in the UK in particular, earth is not readily exploited. Certain factors (enablers), no doubt, may increase the acceptance level of earthen construction and technology, and a key aim of this article is to deliver an in-depth investigation and present a clear understanding of how certain enablers may support the widespread acceptance of earth-based material in the context of UK urban housing. In order to achieve this aim, an Interpretivist research philosophy was employed. It comprises a detailed review of the current literature and Delphi method (designed to identify generic enablers that may support acceptance of earth); in-depth interviews employed to validate and contribute to an extensive list of drivers that may promote the widespread acceptance of earth in the background of UK urban housing. A number of interrelated enablers such as offering earth-based material courses in universities, organizing training programmes for all stakeholders, promoting earth building via British media, increased funding on earth construction innovation and exhibiting exemplar earth architecture are found to be the key enablers of acceptance of earth in the UK urban housing. However, this study recommends that implementing all these enablers along with constructing exemplar earth structures in all local areas of the UK would increase public acceptance of earth.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building material; earth; enablers; environmental sustainability; urban housing
Index terms: Delphi method, interview, philosophy, programme, building material, media, investigation, funding, construction professional, construction innovation, housing, environmental sustainability
Subjects: economic analysis, building materials, construction type, data collection methods, philosophical studies, sociology, building construction, project controls, professional development, health safety and environment
Topics: Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here