Contested overruns and performance of offshore wind power plants

Koch, C (2012) Contested overruns and performance of offshore wind power plants. Construction Management and Economics, 30(8), pp. 609-622. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Offshore wind power plants are expected to expand rapidly in the coming years. These large engineering construction projects are important for climate change mitigation. The paper contributes to socio-technical understanding of engineering construction. Cost, time, delays and performance results of selected British plants are investigated, with a focus on strategic misrepresentation. This megaproject concept is combined with a socio-technical content analysis of offshore wind farms and provides a technologically precise and contemporary conceptualization in comparison with complex engineering and megaproject approaches. Based on publicly available data, budget and time overruns and underperformance are demonstrated. Budget overruns range from 0% to 65%; time overruns from 9% to 100%, Operational performance indicators reveal plants far below and just below estimations. These are all indications of strategic misrepresentation, but according to project players, the delays originate from weather, product technology, site features and processes. The findings thus indicate a latent controversy regarding reasons for overruns. A socio-technical variant of reference class forecasting (RCF) is developed to explore whether RCF could improve the estimates. Socio-technical RCF is developed for 10 plants that share foundation, national and geotechnical conditions. This provides an illustrative example of a proposed uplift for London Array. Such an RCF should be orchestrated with more governance mechanisms in order to improve future investments in engineering construction, including offshore plants.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost overrun; London array; offshore wind power; socio-technical; strategic misrepresentation
Index terms: time overrun, forecasting, construction project, performance indicator, cost overrun, uplift, budget overrun, overrun, governance, content analysis, climate change, wind power, weather, socio-technical, megaproject, estimation, estimate, London, mitigation
Subjects: project controls, data analysis and analytics, prediction and forecasting, strategic project management, energy systems, financial and cost management, financial risk, Geography, performance management, structural engineering, production management, research methods, air quality, business, climate science
Topics: Time Control, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Quality Management, Governance, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here