Transaction-related issues and construction project performance

Li, H; Arditi, D and Wang, Z (2012) Transaction-related issues and construction project performance. Construction Management and Economics, 30(2), pp. 151-164. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Transaction cost economics deals with costs incurred at the pre-contract phase such as the costs of conducting market research, exploring financial opportunities, conducting a feasibility study, organizing a bidding/negotiation and managing design; and with costs incurred in the post-contract phase such as the costs of administering the contract, administering change orders and claims, resolving disputes and managing incentives. Many researchers have investigated the factors that affect project performance over the years, but neglected to consider transaction-related issues. The effects of transaction-related issues on project performance are investigated in this study. Project performance is measured on the basis of completion within budget and on schedule, compliance with quality standards, and satisfaction of the owner. Transaction-related issues include the magnitude of transaction costs, the uncertainty in the transaction environment, and the owner's and the contractor's roles in the transaction. Hypotheses are tested by using a structural equation model using data collected from a survey administered to construction owners. The findings indicate that project performance can be stronger if the uncertainty in the transaction environment is minimized, transaction costs are kept low, and owners and contractors are sensitive to transaction-related issues.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction projects; project performance; transaction cost economics
Index terms: quality standard, satisfaction, change order, owner, dispute, structural equation model, project performance, negotiation, transaction cost, compliance, feasibility study, market research, survey, construction project, bidding
Subjects: project management theory and practice, contractual condition, health safety and environment, production management, sociology, conflict resolution, market analysis, financial analysis, statistical analysis, quality assurance, data collection methods, dispute resolution, design stages, project delivery, bidding
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here