Lingard, H C; Cooke, T and Blismas, N (2012) Designing for construction workers' occupational health and safety: A case study of socio-material complexity. Construction Management and Economics, 30(5), pp. 367-382. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Drawing upon an empirical analysis of the design and construction of a food processing facility, a theoretical understanding of the impact of design decision-making on the occupational health and safety (OHS) of construction workers is developed. It is argued that current policy and legislative approaches to Construction Hazard Prevention through Design (CHPtD) are inherently limited because they do not adequately reflect the socio-material complexity of decision-making in construction design. Specifically, the simplistic attribution of responsibility to a single socio-technical actor, 'the designer', does not reflect the multiple and disparate influences that impact upon OHS outcomes. Nor do existing CHPtD policy frameworks, management processes and tools recognize the manner in which the interactions and associations between relevant project stakeholders and various non-human artefacts shape (and are also influenced by) the evolution of design decisions. Drawing on actor-network theory (ANT) and using embedded units within a case study approach, the interactions between human actors and non-human artefacts are explored in relation to the design of four components of the food processing facility. The way in which design decisions unfolded and shaped OHS experiences during the construction stage of the project is revealed. The research highlights limitations inherent in current approaches to the management of CHPtD and the need to develop a more robust theoretically based approach to integrating OHS considerations into construction design practice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | actor-network theory; construction hazard prevention through design; occupational health and safety |
| Index terms: | designer, case study, socio-technical, design practice, construction worker, interaction, prevention, design and construction, drawing, occupational health and safety, complexity, design decision, artefact, project stakeholder, evolution, decision-making |
| Subjects: | financial risk, design process, research methods, design practice, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, decision analysis, sociology, occupational health and safety management, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, environmental science, contractual arrangements, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here