Modelling the risks of extreme weather events for Australasian hospital infrastructure using rich picture diagrams

Loosemore, M; Chow, V W and McGeorge, D (2012) Modelling the risks of extreme weather events for Australasian hospital infrastructure using rich picture diagrams. Construction Management and Economics, 30(12), pp. 1071-1086. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Anticipated increases in the frequency of extreme weather events in the future are likely to expose hospital infrastructure to new risks which are poorly understood. Traditional approaches to risk identification and analysis produce linear, narrow and static risk profiles which fail to consider complex sub-system interdependencies that may assist or hinder healthcare delivery during an extreme weather event. The ability to create resilient hospitals depends on new risk management methodologies which provide an understanding of these complex relationships. Focus groups with key stakeholders in three hospitals in Australia are used to construct rich picture diagrams (RPDs) of hospital infrastructure interdependencies under different extreme weather event scenarios. They show that the risks posed to hospitals by extreme weather events cannot be considered in isolation from the surrounding infrastructure, emergency management systems, health systems and communities in which they are imbedded. The new insights provided have major governance and policy implications for agencies responsible for ensuring that hospital infrastructure can continue to support the delivery of effective health services during extreme weather events.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: extreme weather; hospitals; risk; stakeholders
Index terms: policy implication, extreme weather event, modelling, risk management, Australia, governance, health service, weather, infrastructure interdependency, agency, emergency management, methodology, risk identification, focus group
Subjects: financial risk, Geography, public and environmental health, research methods, systems engineering, sociology, climate science, business, air quality, policy studies, risk assessment, data collection methods, analytical methods
Topics: Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here