Mokhlesian, S and Holmén, M (2012) Business model changes and green construction processes. Construction Management and Economics, 30(9), pp. 761-775. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Green construction or sustainable construction differs from traditional construction in terms of the materials and processes used. To profit from green construction, firms may need to change their business models, including their offers, activities, networks and revenue models. However there is no explicit study on what changes are required or common in construction companies' business models when they are involved in green construction projects. To systematize prior research a literature review identified changes in business model elements. The results showed that (1) most business model elements can change in a non-trivial manner as a consequence of green construction; (2) value configuration, cost structure, partner networks and capability are the elements emphasized in literature and are expected to be the most difficult and important to change; and (3) to be successful, firms may need to simultaneously change the business model elements of capability, value configuration and partner network on the one hand, and value proposition, cost structure and capability on the other hand.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business model; green building; green construction; literature review; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | construction project, configuration, green building, construction company, construction process, traditional construction, revenue, sustainable construction, literature review, business model, profit |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, sustainable construction, organization, economic analysis, design practice, production management, heritage and conservation, building construction, business, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here