Reducing the use of resources in medium-sized Swedish construction enterprises: Production managers' views

Polesie, P M A (2012) Reducing the use of resources in medium-sized Swedish construction enterprises: Production managers' views. Construction Management and Economics, 30(3), pp. 193-202. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

What construction firms do-and do not do-to reduce the use of resources in construction projects is explored by adopting production managers' views of their firms' onsite activities. A literature review and empirical data are combined; 15 production managers have been asked how they perceived their company's compliance with 31 recommendations to reduce the use of resources. The managers perceived their firms to primarily focus on identifying their customers' real needs, stimulating employees to undertake further education, and striving for long-term customer-supplier relationships. In contrast, they perceived that less attention was directed to making use of all of the week's hours, to supporting their main suppliers in their development, and planning feedback and training after project completion. The use of resources is examined by focusing on the perceived low priority given to gathering information and knowledge, as well as to reducing time and the need for long-term relationships with customers in contrast to short-term relationships with suppliers. The managers adopted a project-specific approach mainly to the use of material resources. A more holistic view of resources could enable the development of novel solutions in construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost reduction; leadership; production manager; resource control; waste management
Index terms: cost reduction, waste management, construction project, compliance, construction firm, literature review, resource control, onsite, manager
Subjects: practitioner, building construction, organization, health safety and environment, production management, economics, waste management, project controls, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here