Sedighi, F and Loosemore, M (2012) Employer-of-choice characteristics in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 30(11), pp. 941-950. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
In many countries, ageing populations, skills shortages and increasing inter-sector labour competition has made graduate recruitment and retention a priority in the construction industry. Understanding what constitutes an employer-of-choice in the eyes of graduates is important in meeting this challenge. A survey of 160 undergraduates across 26 international universities concluded that the top three most important workplace characteristics for university students on construction courses are: positive work relationships, being able to learn on the job, and a workplace that is passionate about work. Distinct gender differences were exposed between preferences as were differences in preferences compared to the preferences of graduates in other industries. These findings contribute to our understanding of how students make choices about employers, what factors are important in making those decisions and how these factors vary between different graduate groups. They also contribute to our understanding of how to design better recruitment strategies to attract talent to the construction sector in an environment where demand is anticipated to exceed supply for some time ahead.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | employer-of-choice; graduates; human resource management; recruitment; retention |
| Index terms: | construction industry, recruitment, undergraduate, ageing population, retention, construction sector, preference, university student, shortages, competition, strategy, human resource management, survey |
| Subjects: | demography, market analysis, industry analysis, decision-making and reasoning, management, curriculum design, economic analysis, curriculum development, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Education, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here