Yuan, X X (2012) Bayesian method for the correlated competitive bidding model. Construction Management and Economics, 30(6), pp. 477-491. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
A multivariate competitive bidding model takes into account the correlation among competitors in determination of markup size. However, parameter estimation for the multivariate model is a challenging issue. A simplified, piecemeal style statistical method was proposed for low-dimension problems. However, this method may cause significant estimation errors when applied to complex bidding situations. A refined Bayesian statistical method based on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation is developed that can be employed in practical bidding problems. To deal with missing values in bid data, a data augmentation technique is integrated in the MCMC process. The proposed Bayesian method is shown through case studies to be robust for complex bidding situations and also insensitive to the selection of the prior models of the correlation matrix. An important feature of the proposed Bayesian method is that it allows a project manager to quantify statistical uncertainties of parameter estimation and their effects on markup decisions. The optimal markup is represented by a posterior distribution which paints a complete picture of the uncertainties involved in the markup size decision.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; decision analysis; modelling; statistical analysis; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | parameter-estimation, multivariate model, bidding, competitive bidding, modelling, dimension, statistical method, decision analysis, statistical analysis, estimation, project manager, case study, Markov chain |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, statistical analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, analytical methods, financial and cost management, bidding, data science, mathematical modelling, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here