Zimina, D; Ballard, G and Pasquire, C (2012) Target value design: Using collaboration and a lean approach to reduce construction cost. Construction Management and Economics, 30(5), pp. 383-398. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Target costing is an effective management technique that has been used in manufacturing for decades to achieve cost predictability during new product development. Adoption of this technique promises benefits for the construction industry as it struggles to raise the number of successful outcomes and certainty of project delivery in terms of cost, quality and time. Target value design is a management approach that takes the best features of target costing and adapts them to the peculiarities of construction. The concept of target value design is introduced based on the results of action research carried out on 12 construction projects in the USA. It has been shown that systemic application of target value design leads to significant improvement of project performance-the final cost of projects was on average 15% less than market cost. The construction industry already has approaches that have similarities with elements of the target value design process or use the same terminology, e.g. partnering and target cost contracts, cost planning, etc. Following an exploration of the similarities and differences target value design is positioned as a form of target costing for construction that offers a more reliable route to successful project outcomes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost planning; lean construction; target cost; target value design |
| Index terms: | cost planning, exploration, construction project, collaboration, action research, lean construction, target costing, project delivery, target value design, construction industry, new product development, project performance, project outcome, target cost, construction cost, partnering |
| Subjects: | production management, project management theory and practice, management, financial management, economics, industry analysis, partnership management, building construction, innovation studies, value management, data collection methods, project completion, project delivery, financial and cost management, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here