Design team meetings and the coordination of expertise: The roof garden of a hospital

Boudeau, C (2013) Design team meetings and the coordination of expertise: The roof garden of a hospital. Construction Management and Economics, 31(1), pp. 78-89. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

The coordination of work and expertise in construction projects is often treated in terms of models or formal rules. However, much is to be gained, if we are to understand it, by examining actual coordination practices. The objective in this article is to address practices of coordination of expertise in the context of design team meetings. The focus is specifically on conversational practices between the structural engineer and the landscape architect who are part of the design team in a healthcare infrastructure project. The central argument is that the coordination of expertise relied on and was organized by mundane and everyday methods, and not by formal and abstract ones. This argument is drawn from ethnomethodology, a form of sociological analysis that focuses on the situated methods by which activities are produced, but shares concerns found in the literature on actual project management practices. The ethnomethodological stance, however, offers a different perspective on the significance of the empirical reality of projects and a possibility to incorporate within this literature a concern with the ordinary methodical organization of project activities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural design; communication; coordination of expertise; ethnography; project team
Index terms: ethnomethodology, coordination, project team, roof, infrastructure project, ethnography, construction project, structural engineer, architectural design, landscape architect, project management practice, design team
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, research methods, management, design practice, project management theory and practice, qualitative and interpretive research, production management, project delivery, professional practice, profession
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here