Caven, V and Astor, E N (2013) The potential for gender equality in architecture: An Anglo-Spanish comparison. Construction Management and Economics, 31(8), pp. 874-882. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
The practice of architecture is very similar in different national settings despite what may be very different sociological and cultural origins of the profession, the attendant variances in how work is organized and distinctions in equality and gender roles. The aim of this paper is to examine the quest for equality in architecture for women in the UK and Spain reporting the findings of a comparative study into women architects' careers in the two countries. Within the qualitative paradigm, semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out with a total of 55 women architects in the UK and Spain. Findings indicate surprising differences in levels and terms of equality for women in the two countries and marked differences in women's experiences of working as an architect. Women have come to the profession in Spain much later than their British counterparts and, somewhat surprisingly, are present in greater numbers. However, despite there being more of a 'critical mass' this has not served to improve their situation; they report much higher levels of discrimination and find it difficult to progress in their careers. Conclusions argue for a stronger approach by the professional bodies to help improve the position of women.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architect; equal opportunities; Spain; UK; women |
| Index terms: | Spain, gender equality, paradigm, discrimination, career, women, equal opportunity, interview, profession, variance, architect, comparative study |
| Subjects: | management, professional ethics, Geography, data collection methods, sociology, education and knowledge transfer, measurement and scaling, institututions, profession, research design and methodology, social justice, professional development |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here