Ataman, C and Dino, İ G (2022) Performative design processes in architectural practices in Turkey: Architects' perception. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(5), pp. 690-704. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
During the last decades, the increasing need to ensure building performance during architectural design has led to highly interactive relations between architecture and various other disciplines, in which concepts of sustainability and building performance are tightly integrated into the design process. However, the adoption of these concepts in architectural practices and the recent advancements in the field have remained rather slow. This research aims to understand performative design (PD) in the context of existing design practices and investigate integrated design strategies and potentials of computational design throughout the whole design process. In this research, a qualitative study was carried out, focusing on PD processes in architectural practices based on semi-structured interviews and case studies. The collected data from nine selected architectural practices is analyzed through a thematic coding approach. The findings reveal that the widespread use of computational tools and technologies and the increasing awareness of both architects and clients on building performance have changed the design priorities in architectural practices. The results also show that the competence of the design team, the tools used during design processes, the involvement of direct and indirect stakeholders, shifting client demands, and market values are effective in pursuing an integrated PD process. Consequently, this research contributes to the current understanding of performative architectural design practices by investigating the key performance concepts, supporting computational tools, and finally the current practices of PD.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computational tools; design management; early design phases; integrated practices; performative design |
| Index terms: | architectural design, architect, design phase, design management, architectural practice, competence, integrated practice, building performance, qualitative study, design team, design process, case study, design strategy, Turkey, design practice, interview |
| Subjects: | design methods, data collection methods, profession, business, research design and methodology, professional practice, Geography, design process, personnel development, design practice, management, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Human Resources, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here