Decoupled NPV: A simple, improved method to value infrastructure investments

Espinoza, D and Morris, J W F (2013) Decoupled NPV: A simple, improved method to value infrastructure investments. Construction Management and Economics, 31(5), pp. 471-496. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Despite its shortcomings, because of its simplicity, the net present value (NPV) technique (or its close relative, the internal rate of return) remains the valuation method most widely used by investors. In this method, all risks associated with a project are lumped into a single parameter (i.e. the risk premium) that is added to the risk-free interest rate to obtain a risk-adjusted discount rate; thus, in essence, the time value of money is adjusted for risk. However, because risk and time are two separate variables, accounting for risk in this manner can lead to substantial valuation errors, particularly for long-term investments which are typical for large infrastructure projects. In this paper, an alternative valuation method that decouples the time value of money from the risk associated with a project is presented. The proposed method, termed decoupled net present value (DNPV), is also simple yet flexible, consistent and robust. The method allows investors to integrate heuristic (i.e. experience based) techniques with sophisticated probabilistic and stochastic techniques to price the risk associated with the value of the asset created and/or the investment needed to create the asset. The proposed method results in a consistent valuation free from the problems typically associated with traditional net present value applications and, more importantly, allows a seamless integration of project risk assessment/management performed by technical experts into the project financial valuation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: dnpv; project finance; real options; risk management; valuation
Index terms: net present value, valuation method, heuristic, project finance, investor, real option, integration, risk assessment, interest rate, risk premium, risk management, large infrastructure project, accounting, infrastructure investment
Subjects: real estate economics, organizational analysis, financial risk, economic analysis, infrastructure engineering, risk assessment, financial management, sociology
Topics: Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here