A novel mathematical model to measure individuals' perception of the symmetry level of building facades

Aydin, Y C and Mirzaei, P A (2022) A novel mathematical model to measure individuals' perception of the symmetry level of building facades. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(3), pp. 261-278. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Symmetry is one of the key parameters in aesthetic judgement, and development of computational aesthetic approaches. Various experimental, statistical, and machine learning-based methods have been developed to parametrically measuring the symmetry, yet mathematical symmetry measurement models were barely studied. The development of mathematical symmetry measurement models can contribute to the development of symmetry-related models, computational aesthetic approach, and architectural design review. Accordingly, this research aims 1) to develop a mathematical model (symmetry index), and 2) to investigate the relationship between symmetry and aesthetic judgment. For this purpose, two surveys were conducted amongst 337 participants, the symmetry and aesthetic of 13 building images were evaluated, and the survey results were compared to the developed symmetry index. According to the findings, a positive correlation between symmetry and aesthetic appreciation was found and the influence of demographic differences on the symmetry, and aesthetic perception was discussed. The developed model successfully predicts the symmetry of studied buildings' images.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: aesthetic judgement; building facade; computational aesthetics; perception; symmetry
Index terms: survey, aesthetic, mathematical model, judgment, architectural design, machine learning
Subjects: factor and component analysis, design practice, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, dispute resolution, artificial intelligence
Topics: Research Practice, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here