Forman, M (2013) Inertia and change: Lean construction and health and safety work on construction sites. Construction Management and Economics, 31(6), pp. 647-660. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Lean construction has been articulated as a concept that can solve health and safety (H&S) problems at construction sites. The question is whether it is that simple. Lean construction and H&S work can be perceived as two different societal change programmes. The focus in this article is on how organizations implement the change programmes and what new forms of practice they stabilize as a result of the implementation process. In particular, the stabilization of new routines for coupling production planning and H&S work are investigated. Applied theories lie within the areas of change processes in organizations, H&S and construction management. The method was based on three qualitative case studies. Three major Danish contractors were involved in the investigation, and for each contractor a construction project was studied on site over a six-month period. Contractors are project-based companies and it seemed that the change programmes and the stabilized new practices that relate production planning and H&S work at construction sites were dependent on the relationship between the functional departments at the company and the construction project, the organizational location of the key actors that drive the change programmes, the 'softness' of the concepts that are implemented and the perception of H&S.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change management; construction sites; health and safety; lean construction; project |
| Index terms: | construction project, change management, construction site, programme, production planning, lean construction, health and safety, routine, implementation, stabilization, investigation, coupling, case study |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, work location, project delivery, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, management, production management, health safety and environment, building construction, sociology, project controls, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Site Management, Organizational Design, Time Control, Procurement, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here