Gruneberg, S and Folwell, K (2013) The use of gross fixed capital formation as a measure of construction output. Construction Management and Economics, 31(4), pp. 359-368. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
There is a need to model construction industries in different countries for international construction marketing purposes and global construction and environmental policy. In the absence of a common method of construction data collection and analysis, estimates of the size of national construction industries use econometric models. One such approach relates contractors' output to its share of gross fixed capital formation (GFCF), and uses this relationship in one economy to estimate construction output in another country. To examine the relationship between contractors' output and GFCF a number of regressions were run. As GFCF is available for all countries, two candidate measures are evaluated as proxies for construction output, namely total GFCF and the construction element of GFCF. A strong relationship is found to exist between UK construction output and GFCF. This is significant as a validation of UK measures of construction output, although the two data series are compiled separately using different samples and some statistical variation would therefore be expected. The paper supports the use of the total construction element in GFCF as a proxy for construction output. This work therefore prepares the way for further modelling of construction output internationally using detailed construction data and GFCF.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction sector; construction statistics; global construction data; gross fixed capital formation |
| Index terms: | construction statistics, construction industry, estimate, modelling, econometric, marketing, international construction, global construction, construction output, environmental policy, construction sector, validation, variation |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, quantitative and statistical methods, professional development, contractual condition, analytical methods, financial and cost management, economic analysis, operations management, public policy, business, strategic management |
| Topics: | International Construction, Contract Administration, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here