Manley, S and de Graft-Johnson, A (2013) Towards inclusion: Rethinking architectural education. Construction Management and Economics, 31(8), pp. 914-927. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
In 2009, concerned at the low profile of disabled architects, the Royal Institute of British Architects commissioned the University of the West of England, Bristol to undertake research into the experiences of disabled people both as students and as practitioners of architecture. The aim of the research was to assess the current situation and identify and distil best practice in encouraging and enabling disabled people to pursue an architectural career. The research method included online questionnaires and interviews with disabled people who were either studying or practising as architects. Support workers, with a variety of roles and remits in both education and practice, were interviewed to assess the level and quality of provision and to determine attitudes towards disabled people. Websites of schools of architecture and practices were analysed. Significant issues were revealed relating to the representation and participation of disabled people in architectural education and employment. In particular, the educational ethos, curriculum and delivery raised concerns, as education acts as a gatekeeper to the profession. It is concluded that architecture schools and practitioners need to be proactive in creating more inclusive cultures and approaches to design which in turn could benefit the design of the built environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; disability; education; equalities; inclusion |
| Index terms: | Royal Institute of British Architects, employment, England, architect, built environment, profession, best practice, architectural education, disabled, interview, disability, questionnaire, practitioner, career |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, health conditions and diseases, sociology, Geography, professional development, management, curriculum design, professional institution, institututions, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, business |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Ethics, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here