Masrom, M D A; Skitmore, M and Bridge, A (2013) Determinants of contractor satisfaction. Construction Management and Economics, 31(7), pp. 761-779. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Performance in the construction industry is increasingly scrutinized as a result of the delays, cost overruns and poor quality of the industry's products and services. Increasingly, disputes, conflicts and mismatches of objectives among participants are contributory factors. Performance measurement approaches have been developed to overcome these problems. However, these approaches focus primarily on objective measures to the exclusion of subjective measures, particularly those concerning contractor satisfaction (Co-S). The contractor satisfaction model (CoSMo) developed here is intended to rectify the situation. Data derived from a questionnaire survey of 75 large contractors in Malaysia in respect of a key project are analysed to identify participant factors and their strength of relationship with Co-S dimensions. The results are presented in the form of eight regression equations. The outcome is a tool for use by project participants to provide a better understanding of how they, and the project, affect contractor satisfaction. The developed model sheds some light on a hitherto unknown aspect of construction management in providing an increased awareness of the importance of major Malaysian construction contractors' needs in the execution of successful projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor; Malaysia; measurement; model; satisfaction |
| Index terms: | survey, construction contractor, questionnaire, dispute, contributory factor, cost overrun, satisfaction, Malaysia, performance measurement, dimension, mismatch, construction industry, determinant |
| Subjects: | engineering problems, risk assessment, data collection methods, practitioner, dispute resolution, health monitoring assessment and metrics, project delivery, financial and cost management, performance measurement, Geography, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here