A case study on automated safety compliance checking to assist fall protection design and planning in building information models

Melzner, J; Zhang, S; Teizer, J and Bargstädt, H J (2013) A case study on automated safety compliance checking to assist fall protection design and planning in building information models. Construction Management and Economics, 31(6), pp. 661-674. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Worldwide occupational safety statistics show that the construction industry in many countries experiences one of the highest accident rates of all industry sectors. Falls remain a major concern as they contribute to very serious injuries or even fatalities on construction projects around the world. Since the standards and rules for protective safety equipment vary by country, the growing numbers of internationally operating companies are in need of tools that allow ubiquitous understanding and planning of safety regardless of the country where they operate. The problem is examined using a customizable automatic safety rule-checking platform for building information models. The applied rule-based checking algorithms are designed to be add-ons to existing building information modelling (BIM) software and can check models for safety hazards early in the design and planning process. Once hazards have been identified preventative safety equipment can be designed, estimated, and included in the construction schedule before construction starts. A case study implements the safety rule-checking platform on a high-rise building project. Fall protection regulations from both the USA and Germany are applied to the developed rule-checking platform. Visualization of the safety information further explains the differences in the results once country-specific safety-regulative standards are applied on the same building information model. The case study also indicates that the role of BIM in safety design and planning can effectively assist the traditional safety decision-making process for fall protection equipment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling; fall protection; prevention through design; safety design and planning; standards
Index terms: Germany, regulation, construction project, high-rise building, visualization, injury, industry sector, compliance, statistics, fatalities, safety equipment, occupational safety, prevention, construction industry, platform, case study, building information modelling, planning process, falls, decision-making process
Subjects: design practice, health risk and incident analysis, production management, health safety and environment, Geography, financial risk, digital design, project controls, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, decision analysis, industry analysis, information systems, political science, data collection methods, construction type, mathematical modelling
Topics: Governance, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here