Construction as a career choice for young disabled people: Dispelling the myths

Ormerod, M and Newton, R (2013) Construction as a career choice for young disabled people: Dispelling the myths. Construction Management and Economics, 31(8), pp. 928-938. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Disabled people want to have the same opportunities and experiences as everyone else, yet owing to a number of barriers they are often excluded from meaningful employment. There are few statistics available in the UK to provide an accurate understanding of the number of disabled people within construction, and there remains a lack of research on employment, disability and construction. The perceptions of, and barriers faced by, young disabled people in considering potential employment in the construction industry were investigated. A participatory research approach was adopted which places disabled people at the heart of the research process. A mix of interviews and mini focus groups was undertaken with a total of 49 participants drawn from the North West of England. The need for inclusive approaches within the construction industry came across strongly, with participants preferring to be treated equally rather than being treated favourably. Disabled young people are unlikely to consider employment within construction without better awareness raising by industry-both employers and professional institutions-of the range and scope of opportunities available, and a dispelling of the myths that construction is for able-bodied, fit, men.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction sector; disability; discrimination; employment; policy
Index terms: discrimination, interview, disabled, disability, construction industry, employment, focus group, career, statistics, construction sector, heart, England
Subjects: medical science and clinical practice, sociology, Geography, industry analysis, mathematical modelling, professional ethics, health conditions and diseases, data collection methods, professional development, management
Topics: Information Management, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Ethics
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here