Chun, S and Nam, K (2022) Analyzation and prioritization of healthcare environment criteria for designing geriatric long-term care private hospitals in South Korea using an analytic hierarchy process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(5), pp. 723-738. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Appropriate decision-making for selecting the suitable planning for geriatric long-term care hospitals (GHs) is critical to address design uncertainties. Previous studies related to GHs have focused on analyzing criteria, but they did not provide the priority of criteria for decision-making. Moreover, GHs should be considered differently from both general hospitals and geriatric long-term care public hospitals. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose healthcare environment criteria (HEC) that guide the design and suggest priorities of each criterion for design decision making that are suitable for planning GHs. First, previous studies were reviewed and relevant criteria were extracted. Next, a group of academics was enlisted to review the proposed criteria. Then, an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed among healthcare professionals to evaluate the importance of each criterion. This study identifies 7 criteria and 43 sub-criteria as well as provides the priorities of each criterion and sub-criterion. An intelligent system and appealing facility criteria were newly suggested and other sub-criteria were modified to fit the condition of GHs. To ranking each of the sub-criteria from each healthcare provider, the criteria ranked in the top six were all related to safety-related criteria. Accessibility and intelligent system criteria showed large deviations in the corresponding relative importance rates. From the study, a framework of HEC for GHs in South Korea which is different from general hospitals nor geriatric long-term care public hospitals was provided and the strongest-weighted HEC for decision-makers to identify areas of improvement was suggested.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytic hierarchy process; design decision-making; evidence-based design; geriatric long-term care private hospitals; healthcare environment criteria |
| Index terms: | accessibility, relative importance, South Korea, evidence-based design, deviation, intelligent system, geriatric, decision-making, design decision |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, design methods, risk assessment, decision analysis, Geography, automation and robotics, design practice, inclusive design, public and environmental health |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Risk Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here