Sacks, R; Perlman, A and Barak, R (2013) Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Construction Management and Economics, 31(9), pp. 1005-1017. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Construction workers' ability to identify and assess risks is acquired through training and experience and is among the key factors that determine their behaviour and thus their safety. Yet researchers have questioned the effectiveness of conventional safety training. This research tested the hypotheses that safety training in a virtual reality (VR) construction site would be feasible and more effective, in terms of workers' learning and recall in identifying and assessing construction safety risks, than would equivalent training using conventional methods. Sixty-six subjects were provided training in construction safety and their safety knowledge was tested prior to the training, immediately afterward, and one month later. Half of the subjects received traditional classroom training with visual aids; the other half were trained using a 3D immersive VR power-wall. Significant advantage was found for VR training for stone cladding work and for cast-in-situ concrete work, but not for general site safety. VR training was more effective in terms of maintaining trainees' attention and concentration. Training with VR was more effective over time, especially in the context of cast-in-situ concrete works. Given the need for improved training and the advantages of training using VR, incorporation of VR in construction safety training is strongly recommended.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; immersive virtual reality; safety training |
| Index terms: | construction site, training in construction, classroom, construction safety, effectiveness, in-situ, virtual reality, cladding, construction worker, safety training |
| Subjects: | performance management, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, building construction, practitioner, construction type, virtual reality, curriculum development, work location, building materials |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here