UK construction site safety: Discourses of enforcement and engagement

Sherratt, F; Farrell, P and Noble, R (2013) UK construction site safety: Discourses of enforcement and engagement. Construction Management and Economics, 31(6), pp. 623-635. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Developments in safety management on large UK construction sites have seen a paradigm shift from enforcement-based systems to safety-culture programmes, which seek to engage with the workforce to create fully cooperative and safety-conscious sites. Founded in social constructionism, recent research sought out the master discourses of safety on large UK construction sites through the examination of safety signage, talk around safety and safety documentation. Two of the most prominent discourses of safety on sites were found to be safety as enforcement and safety as engagement, reflecting the change in safety management strategies. These discourses were found to be interrelated in their constructions of safety, yet also varied in their associations with practice, responsibility, social interactions and the management hierarchy of the sites. These findings develop the current understanding of safety found on sites, with relation to the hierarchical structures of safety management and the discourses of enforcement and engagement in practice. The findings have significance for the safety practices of large UK contractors in developing and improving their safety-culture programmes, as well as suggesting potential new directions in the academic research of safety in construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction sites; discourse analysis; safety; social constructionism; UK
Index terms: paradigm, enforcement, social interaction, safety management, construction site, strategy, programme, documentation
Subjects: work location, sociology, project controls, occupational health and safety management, professional development, health safety and environment, education and knowledge transfer, management
Topics: Time Control, Site Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here