Five moments in the history of industrialized building

Ågren, R and Wing, R D (2014) Five moments in the history of industrialized building. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1-2), pp. 7-15. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Industrialized building has drawn in ideas from many pioneering researchers during its decades of development; in this brief recapitulation we present some observations on selected moments in the history that have significantly shaped the approach to building construction. The first formative movement identified is prefabrication, as used by Joseph Paxton during construction of the Crystal Palace. Prefabrication inspired Frank Lloyd Wright's American System Built Homes, and enabled the development of Le Corbusier's mass production ideas in the Modern Frugés Quarter project. Early forerunners saw connections with the automotive industry; Le Corbusier developed a house called Citrohan and Buckminster Fuller wanted to create 'houses like Fords'. From prefabrication followed the concept of building in sub-assemblies, as showcased by Walter Gropius in his Törten estate; Konrad Wachsmann took this notion further into modularization and mass production with the creation of factory-produced panel and space frame systems. At much the same time Buckminster Fuller proposed the modular Dymaxion house, which included a functioning bathroom delivered in four pieces. In 1962 John Habraken presented ideas which led to what are now called open systems, suggesting standardized dimensions in the modularization in order to enable a wide array of choices for end-users. Even today not all the expectations of industrialized building have been realized, and it is instructive to look back at the origins of some of the fundamental concepts which form the backbone of this subject.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design for manufacture; industrialization; modularization; open systems; prefabrication; sub-assembly
Index terms: automotive industry, industrialized building, prefabrication, dimension, design for manufacture, modularization, industrialization, building construction, movement, history
Subjects: health behaviours and lifestyles, health monitoring assessment and metrics, architectural and construction history, economic development, manufacturing engineering, industry analysis, building construction
Topics: Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here