Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D and Smith, S D (2014) Dealing with construction cost overruns using data mining. Construction Management and Economics, 32(7-8), pp. 682-694. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
One of the main aims of any construction client is to procure a project within the limits of a predefined budget. However, most construction projects routinely overrun their cost estimates. Existing theories on construction cost overrun suggest a number of causes ranging from technical difficulties, optimism bias, managerial incompetence and strategic misrepresentation. However, much of the budgetary decision-making process in the early stages of a project is carried out in an environment of high uncertainty with little available information for accurate estimation. Using non-parametric bootstrapping and ensemble modelling in artificial neural networks, final project cost-forecasting models were developed with 1600 completed projects. This helped to extract information embedded in data on completed construction projects, in an attempt to address the problem of the dearth of information in the early stages of a project. It was found that 92% of the 100 validation predictions were within ±10% of the actual final cost of the project while 77% were within ±5% of actual final cost. This indicates the model's ability to generalize satisfactorily when validated with new data. The models are being deployed within the operations of the industry partner involved in this research to help increase the reliability and accuracy of initial cost estimates.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural networks; bootstrapping; cost overrun; data mining; ensemble modelling |
| Index terms: | construction client, optimism bias, accuracy, artificial neural network, project cost, data mining, forecasting, modelling, construction project, construction cost, cost overrun, overrun, decision-making process, validation, cost estimate, estimation |
| Subjects: | data science, cognitive psychology, practitioner, analytical methods, financial and cost management, production management, economics, decision analysis, project controls, professional development, prediction and forecasting, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Time Control, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management, Project Management, Information Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here