Evaluating impact of construction risks in the Arabian gulf region from perspective of multinational architecture, engineering and construction firms

Al-Sabah, R; Menassa, C C and Hanna, A (2014) Evaluating impact of construction risks in the Arabian gulf region from perspective of multinational architecture, engineering and construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 32(4), pp. 382-402. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Although multinational firms use risk mitigation measures when venturing into new international markets, there has been little research into identifying and evaluating the impact of these risks on project and multinational firm performance in the Arabian Gulf Region (AGR). Risks encountered in the AGR are identified through a data collection process from multinational architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) companies with work experience in the AGR. The impact of these risks on four performance metrics (i.e. project cost, schedule and performance; and company performance) is then evaluated using relative importance index (RII), significance score (SS) and principal component analysis (PCA) for validation. The results indicate that multinational firms are potentially exposed to a total of 27 external risks and 47 internal risks. Of the 27 external risks, war threat, political instability, price inflation, resources availability and quality, authorities and regulations requirements, and inclement climate have the most significant impact on the four performance metrics. Of the 47 internal risks, defective late design documents, constructive changes and insufficient scope definition have the most significant impact on the four performance metrics. These findings can guide multinational AEC firms in the AGR in establishing effective risk mitigation plans.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: arabian gulf region; international construction; multinational firms; risks
Index terms: construction firm, project cost, relative importance index, performance metric, risk mitigation, regulation, documents, validation, inflation, firm performance, international market, international construction, principal component analysis, war
Subjects: economic analysis, organization, risk assessment, strategic management, political science, statistical analysis, development economics, professional development, financial risk, conflict and crisis studies, business analysis, economics, performance measurement
Topics: International Construction, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Governance, Risk Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here