Buyer-supplier relationships in industrialized building

Bildsten, L (2014) Buyer-supplier relationships in industrialized building. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1-2), pp. 146-159. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Close collaboration is considered important; but is close collaboration for all purchases necessary to create value-in-production? In construction as well as in other industries, companies purchase a variety of items that require different amounts of attention to the relationship with suppliers. Buyer-supplier relationships are investigated in relation to how they bring value-in-production in the industrialized building sector. An adaptation of the Kraljic model is applied to the context of industrialized housebuilding in Sweden. Different relationships and different purchased items are classified with the aim of revealing patterns that may prove useful when determining purchasing strategies intended to create value-in-production. Purchasing strategies were studied through data collection at four industrialized housebuilders. Analysis of these strategies suggests that the total product offer from suppliers in terms of customization, logistics and standardization plays an important role in the choice of suppliers in order to satisfy the requirement for efficient production. Long-term relationships enable the development of a specific way of working that adds value-in-production. A new purchasing portfolio model for determining the effectiveness of purchasing strategies on the production process is thus presented, where products are classified according to value-in-production.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buyer-supplier relationships; industrialized building; kraljic model; materials; purchasing
Index terms: standardization, collaboration, Sweden, industrialized building, customization, adaptation, housebuilding, housebuilder, strategy, effectiveness, production process, purchasing
Subjects: practitioner, performance management, Geography, construction integration, manufacturing engineering, construction manufacturing, management, user focus, building construction, performance measurement, procurement strategy
Topics: Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here