Carbonara, N; Costantino, N and Pellegrino, R (2014) Revenue guarantee in public-private partnerships: A fair risk allocation model. Construction Management and Economics, 32(4), pp. 403-415. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are adopted throughout the world for delivering public infrastructure. Despite the attractiveness of the PPP structure, its implementation has not been without trouble due to multiple uncertainties embedded with PPP projects. Private investors often require some mitigation of these risks through government support. One of the most common forms of government support is minimum revenue guarantee (MRG). A real option-based model is developed that uses a new mechanism for setting the revenue guarantee level secured by the government, which balances the private sector's profitability needs and the public sector's fiscal management interests and uses the concept of fairness for structuring MRGs. The model uses Monte Carlo simulation to take into account the uncertainty. The model is applied to the projected 1 kilometre long 'Camionale di Bari' toll road that will link the port of Bari (located in Puglia, Southern Italy) with the existing road network without affecting the urban traffic. It was found that government support is often needed to make the project attractive to private investors and that the developed model can be, for both public and private sectors, a valid tool for defining the fair value of the minimum amount of revenue secured by the government.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | public-private partnerships; real options |
| Index terms: | toll, revenue, guarantee, mitigation, Italy, Monte Carlo simulation, partnership, private sector, public sector, investor, government support, public infrastructure, fair value, implementation, real option, fairness, profitability, risk allocation |
| Subjects: | contract structure, Geography, financial risk, partnership management, sociology, administrative law, leadership, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, transportation engineering, government bodies, modelling and simulation, contractual arrangements, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here