Challenges for capturing and assessing initial embodied energy: A contractor's perspective

Davies, P J; Emmitt, S and Firth, S K (2014) Challenges for capturing and assessing initial embodied energy: A contractor's perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 32(3), pp. 290-308. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

Initial embodied energy includes energy use during material, transportation, and construction life cycle phases up to project practical completion. Contractors have an important role to play in reducing initial embodied energy levels due to their significant involvement in preconstruction and onsite construction activities. Following an extensive literature review a comprehensive framework was designed to highlight the significance of initial embodied energy levels relative to specific construction packages, activities and subcontractors. This framework was then applied to a new UK industrial warehouse project using a case study approach. Capturing information from a live project during the entire construction phase helped highlight the practical challenges inherent when capturing and assessing initial embodied energy levels. A series of contractor current practices was reviewed to determine their compliance with the framework requirements. The findings revealed that the ground and upper floor, external slab and frame were the most significant construction packages in terms of embodied impacts. Many challenges embedded within the contractor's current practices in terms of data detail, legibility, and terminology were also revealed. The framework provides a practical approach for initial embodied energy assessment which can readily be adopted by contractors to help highlight opportunities to increase efficiency.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractor; embodied energy; life cycle; materials; transport
Index terms: embodied energy, compliance, subcontractor, onsite, package, construction activity, life cycle, literature review, case study, efficiency, energy use, construction phase
Subjects: value management, building construction, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, practitioner, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, performance management, project delivery, energy systems
Topics: Quality Management, Site Management, Procurement, Project Management, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here