Eriksson, P E; Olander, S; Szentes, H and Widén, K (2014) Managing short-term efficiency and long-term development through industrialized construction. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1-2), pp. 97-108. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
There is a strong need for a productive and innovative infrastructure sector because of its monetary value and importance for the development of a sustainable society. An increased level of industrialization is often proposed as a way to improve efficiency and productivity in construction projects. In prior literature on industrialized construction, there are however neither many studies addressing more long-term aspects of innovation and sustainability nor studies within the infrastructure context. Organizational theory suggests that firms need to be ambidextrous and focus on both long-term exploration of new knowledge and technologies and short-term exploitation of current knowledge and technologies, in order to achieve sustainable development. Therefore, an investigation of how both short-term exploitative performance objectives and long-term explorative development can be addressed when implementing industrialized construction in infrastructure projects was conducted. A case study consisting of four infrastructure projects shows that the main drivers for increased industrialization are of an exploitative nature, focusing on cost savings and increased productivity through more efficient processes. The main barriers to increased industrialization are however related to both explorative and exploitative activities. Hence, by managing the identified barriers and explicitly addressing both exploitation and exploration, industrialized construction can improve both short-term efficiency and long-term innovation and sustainability.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ambidexterity; efficiency; industrialization; infrastructure; sustainability |
| Index terms: | ambidexterity, society, organizational theory, sustainable development, industrialization, exploration, construction project, infrastructure sector, industrialized construction, efficiency, case study, productivity, exploitation, investigation, cost saving, infrastructure project |
| Subjects: | communities and social development, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, production management, health safety and environment, economics, performance management, economic development, management, environmental resource management, business, data collection methods, strategic management, construction type |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here