Hogarth, T and Gambin, L (2014) Employer investment in apprenticeships in England: An exploration of the sensitivity of employers in the construction sector to the net costs of training. Construction Management and Economics, 32(9), pp. 845-856. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Apprenticeships in England are undergoing major reform which will likely require employers to make a cash contribution to meeting the fees of their training providers. In return employers will be given more influence over the content of the training. If employers are expected to make a cash contribution this is likely to have an impact on their willingness to deliver Apprenticeships. Based on a series of employer case studies conducted between 1995 and 2011 an examination is provided of construction employers' sensitivity to the costs of delivering Apprenticeships. Because the cost to the employer is relatively high, and because there is a degree of uncertainty attached to recouping those costs, there is a distinct set of disincentives to construction employers providing Apprenticeships. This is important. First, the construction sector will need to recruit a large number of additional people into skilled trades jobs over the next 10 years as the sector's recovery gains pace and many existing employees retire. Second, Apprenticeships in the sector have an important role to play in young people's transition from school into work. A fall in the number of apprentices in the sector is likely to have important economic and social consequences.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | apprenticeship; skill; training |
| Index terms: | construction sector, apprenticeship, exploration, England, recovery, case study |
| Subjects: | Geography, industry analysis, professional education, data collection methods, operations management, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Education, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here