Towards a shift in mindset: Partnering projects as engagement platforms

Jacobsson, M and Roth, P (2014) Towards a shift in mindset: Partnering projects as engagement platforms. Construction Management and Economics, 32(5), pp. 419-432. ISSN 01446193

Abstract

The last decade has seen shifts in both practice and research regarding client-supplier relationships. Cooperative project client-supplier relationships have become increasingly common, and have spurred a stream of vivid research on for example alliances and partnering. Despite increased attention, an insufficient understanding of the relationship dimension is identified, described as a 'black box'. Here it is suggested that a key to unlock this 'black box' is to focus on the everyday practice and the role of the mindset of involved actors throughout the project. We argue that running partnering projects involves more deeply rooted changes than previously recognized. Changes relate to the mindset among involved actors, where service (instead of merely products or production) becomes the core denominator. First we aim to illustrate that a partnering project, if well functioning, can be understood as an engagement platform, and second we aim to discuss the consequences if this is acknowledged in practice. The case, a successful Swedish partnering project, is explored from a service-dominant logic perspective and it is suggested that successful partnering projects are to be defined as engagement platforms. A refined categorization of the components of partnering is provided and the implications of a shift in mindset discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; partnering; project; relational contracting
Index terms: case study, service-dominant logic, stream, dimension, project client, platform, mindset, partnering, relational contracting
Subjects: data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, organization, partnership management, sociology, water management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, digital design, contractual arrangements
Topics: Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here