Javed, A A; Lam, P T I and Chan, A P C (2014) Change negotiation in public-private partnership projects through output specifications: An experimental approach based on game theory. Construction Management and Economics, 32(4), pp. 323-348. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Public-private partnership (PPP) projects specify outputs rather than inputs. While changes are inevitable over long concession periods, output specifications should facilitate the negotiation of foreseeable changes. An experimental approach based on game theory was adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies for negotiating changes. A multi-stage bargaining process using the 'z-Tree' software was designed to simulate four change scenarios with three output specification versions encompassing different change management strategies in a computer laboratory. Under each change scenario, pairs of public and private participants negotiated on the sharing of additional costs incurred by changes in the life cycles of fictitious PPP projects based on the different versions of output specification. The time taken to reach settlement or negotiation breakdown was recorded together with the cost-sharing pattern, with feedback collected from the participants on the effectiveness of the specification strategies immediately after the experiment. It was found that a detailed and clear output specification incorporating a cost-sharing framework facilitates change negotiations. Although the first-mover advantage was recorded, the gaps were narrowed in the multi-stage bargains. A similar controlled experiment was conducted with university students for comparison. Findings should lead to improvements in output specifications for change negotiation of PPP projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change negotiation; game theory; output specifications; private finance; ultimatum bargaining |
| Index terms: | negotiating, effectiveness, concession period, strategy, experiment, bargaining, negotiation, specification, game theory, life cycle, partnership, private finance, laboratory, university student, change management |
| Subjects: | conflict resolution, performance management, decision models, curriculum design, data collection methods, management, partnership management, contract structure, value management, contractual condition, contractual arrangements, research management, economics |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design, Project Management, Contract Administration, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here