Jonsson, H and Rudberg, M (2014) Classification of production systems for industrialized building: A production strategy perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1-2), pp. 53-69. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The purpose is to develop a matrix for classifying production systems for construction with various degrees of industrialization. Previous attempts to classify industrialized production systems for construction focus on dimensions such as the design process, the product technology, or the supply chain structure, but none of them acknowledge the importance of how orders are actually won in the market and that different market segments have different requirements. Using production strategy theory as a base, a matrix is developed linking market requirements, via the product offering, to the design of the production system. The matrix positions typical production systems based on their respective degrees of product standardization and volumes relative to the degree of offsite production. Similar to production systems in manufacturing, production systems for construction also deliver manufacturing outputs at different levels, indicating that the choice of production system will affect the competitiveness of the company. The applicability of the matrix is exemplified through three case illustrations of concepts for industrialized building, and these show that the matrix can be used to analyse the production systems' relative strengths and weaknesses. The matrix can also be used as a guide when developing new, or adjusting existing, production systems for industrialized building so that they will match market requirements and offer competitiveness.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; industrialized housing; offsite production; operational research; production process |
| Index terms: | production process, industrialization, market segment, production system, design process, housing, operational research, production strategy, construction industry, industrialized building, dimension, competitiveness, standardization |
| Subjects: | market analysis, building construction, industry analysis, management, economic development, manufacturing engineering, performance measurement, health monitoring assessment and metrics, construction type, design methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Design Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here