Ju, C and Rowlinson, S (2014) Institutional determinants of construction safety management strategies of contractors in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 32(7-8), pp. 725-736. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Workplace safety in the construction industry of Hong Kong is regulated by a mix of enforcement and performance-based approaches. The two approaches are underpinned by different institutional structures and lead to divergent safety practices. To examine how contractors strategically respond to the complex institutional demands for safety performance, contractors' day-to-day site safety practices were investigated. Safety practice data were obtained from 62 open-ended interviews and project archives in a case study. Different supervision patterns, i.e. enforcement and localized approaches were found to coexist on site. Discrepancies were found between workers' self-reported safety awareness and safety awareness assessed by their supervisors. The evidence suggests that contractors implemented compromise and avoidance strategies. The complex institutional environment, especially the incompatible progress and safety requirements, was found to be a key determinant of mixed site safety practices. Institutional theory is explored as a possible theoretical perspective to explain contractors' safety management strategies. An institutional level change of safety management strategies is suggested.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor; Hong Kong; institutions; strategy-as-practice |
| Index terms: | safety performance, supervision, workplace safety, strategy, construction industry, safety management, strategy-as-practice, supervisor, management strategy, institutional theory, performance-based, evidence, Hong Kong, determinant, enforcement, interview, case study, construction safety |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, occupational health, risk assessment, performance measurement, control systems, occupational health and safety management, data collection methods, environmental health, management, health safety and environment, industry analysis, practitioner, Geography, sociology |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Project Management, Sustainability, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here