Konno, Y (2014) Japanese competitive bid entry qualifications: An examination of public works. Construction Management and Economics, 32(10), pp. 957-967. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
This study summarises the independent competitive bid entry qualifications examination of public works in Japan. Contractors who wish to undertake public works must be scored by a nationwide standardised objective examination called Keiei Jikou Sinsa or Keisin in Japanese. They must be graded on the basis of the score of not only the objective examination but also an independent assessment by the orderers. This study explains the calculation of Keisin using a virtual contractor. This study also discusses the effectiveness of Keisin and the efficiency of the grading system. Keisin is used not only for bid entry qualifications in public works, but also to evaluate construction companies by the orderers of private works and financial institutions. Additionally, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism uses Keisin to promote subscription to social insurance and thus contribute to improve workers' lifelong protection. The Japanese grading system in public bids underpins competitive bidding among firms of similar scale and capability, while providing opportunities for SMEs in every industry class to obtain construction contracts as prime contractors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bid entry qualifications; evaluation of construction firms; public works |
| Index terms: | public work, construction firm, tourism, qualification, efficiency, effectiveness, insurance, construction contract, Japan, construction company, land, competitive bidding |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, economic analysis, contract type, Geography, bidding, infrastructure engineering, performance management, organization, educational resources, real estate economics |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Education, Geographical Context, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here