Larsson, J; Eriksson, P E; Olofsson, T and Simonsson, P (2014) Industrialized construction in the Swedish infrastructure sector: Core elements and barriers. Construction Management and Economics, 32(1-2), pp. 83-96. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Improving productivity and innovation is a central challenge in all industries, but particularly in construction where improvements have been slow. To meet this challenge, a recent investigation into the actions of Swedish government clients has recognized needs to improve planning during project procurement phases, increase numbers of turnkey contracts and raise industrialization of the sector. In response, the Swedish Transportation Administration has launched a research and innovation programme to foster an industrial approach and identify ways to increase the standardization of products and processes. However, increasing industrialization has been difficult to achieve in the project-based construction industry except in the process-based housing sector. Further, there has been little research on the concept of industrialized infrastructure construction and barriers to its implementation. Opinions and attitudes of clients, consultants and contractors in the infrastructure sector were investigated in relation to the core elements of industrialized construction, and the barriers hindering its development. Opportunities and obstacles related to both product and process standardization for continuous improvements and the relationships between clients and contractors are revealed. Hence, the implementation of industrialized construction requires tightly focused governance at the outset of projects and profound changes to established attitudes, norms and regulations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | barriers; industrialization; infrastructure; prefabrication; standardization |
| Index terms: | infrastructure construction, infrastructure sector, project procurement, housing, industrialized construction, norms, regulation, industrialization, programme, construction industry, prefabrication, implementation, standardization, investigation, continuous improvement, productivity, governance |
| Subjects: | civil engineering, economic development, management, performance measurement, political science, industry analysis, building construction, sociology, project controls, business, data collection methods, construction type, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Governance, Quality Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here