Lavy, S; Garcia, J A; Scinto, P and Dixit, M K (2014) Key performance indicators for facility performance assessment: Simulation of core indicators. Construction Management and Economics, 32(12), pp. 1183-1204. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Assessing a facility’s performance is important for measuring its contribution towards organizational goals. Among many approaches to performance assessment is the holistic key performance indicator (KPI) approach. However, there are numerous KPIs available, and the chosen KPI needs to be relevant to facility goals and must be calculated, analysed and evaluated to allow for the future state of the facility to be acceptable at the lowest cost. The value of several key descriptive analytics in facility performance assessment may be enhanced through the use of simulation. Simulation transforms the descriptive analytics into predictive and prescriptive analytics by allowing for the robust assessment of plans and future outcomes through the creation of multiple scenarios, in this case, for an education facility. The simulation approach quantifies the interrelationship and interdependence of KPIs, and is potentially effective in analysing how maintenance expenditures can be optimized to maintain a desired level of Condition Index as demonstrated by several simulation scenarios.,
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | educational facilities; facility management; key performance indicators; maintenance; simulation |
| Index terms: | educational facility, key performance indicator, interdependence, lowest cost, performance assessment |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, assessment methods, project delivery, construction type, bidding |
| Topics: | Project Management, Human Resources, Procurement, Construction Technology, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here