Lu, W (2014) Reliability of Engineering News-Record international construction data. Construction Management and Economics, 32(10), pp. 968-982. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
Since the late 1970s, the Engineering News-Record (ENR) has produced annual lists ranking firms involved in development of the built environment on the basis of their international revenues. ENR lists, such as the Top 225 International Contractors and the Top 200 International Design Firms, have become popular datasets for international construction research. Nonetheless, given that the ENR data are self-reported, reviewers for journals and research funding bodies frequently question the reliability of the data. The aim of this research is to ascertain the extent to which the self-report ENR data can be considered reliable for international construction research. Inter-data reliability tests conducted to measure the levels of resemblance between the ENR data and annual report data of 51 sample companies found that, contrary to the prevalent view that companies reporting to the ENR tend to inflate their revenues, there are no systematic errors in the ENR data. Although slight discrepancies were found, ENR data can be confidently used for international construction research. Journal reviewers and editors should be more open to ENR international construction data, rather than taking the default position that the data are inherently and seriously problematic and thus automatically dismissing those studies that use such data.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | data reliability; engineering news-record; international companies; international construction; self-report data |
| Index terms: | default, annual report, journal, revenue, research funding, dataset, design firm, international construction, built environment |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, data management, research management, dispute resolution, practitioner, research dissemination and communication, strategic management, business, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, International Construction, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here