High-performance building projects: How to build trust in the team

Engebø, A; Klakegg, O J; Lohne, J; Bohne, R A; Fyhn, H and Lædre, O (2022) High-performance building projects: How to build trust in the team. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(6), pp. 774-790. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Trust is a prerequisite in all endeavours concerning uncertainty and interdependencies. By studying the development of a sustainable, high performing building this paper report on such an endeavour. The client implemented a collaborative project delivery method where key actors were brought together to collaboratively develop the project in the design phase. For the participants to collaborate, and thus work as a high-performance team, there was a need for trust. Therefore, this study addresses the following research questions: what was perceived as the key elements for building trust in this project? and, how did the key elements impact the trust-building in this project? The study is based on observations of weekly design meetings (so-called Big-Room sessions), as well as secondary data from a document study, and a supplementary questionnaire. Trust was essential as the participants were able to rely on each other’s expertise and work interdependently towards a common goal. The most prominent elements that affected trust were the start-up seminar, team composition, shared interest, support from management, joint problem solving, and the use of integrated concurrent engineering. These elements built and sustained trust due to their ability to create or positively impact the experiences, problem-solving, shared goals, reciprocity, and reasonable behaviour of the project team. The insight into how the collaborative project delivery method build trust may be valuable for practitioners and researchers alike.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building design management; collaborative project delivery; high-performance buildings; integrated concurrent engineering; integrated team; project delivery methods; trust
Index terms: integrated team, project team, team composition, trust-building, project delivery, concurrent engineering, problem solving, questionnaire, practitioner, collaborative project, design phase, delivery method, building design management, secondary data
Subjects: delivery method, design process, management, decision-making and reasoning, engineering methods, professional practice, contractual arrangements, project delivery, psychology, practitioner, data collection methods
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here